RelationWatch
OSINT Case File

Roh So-young Divorce Legal Battle Involving Chey Tae-won, Seoul, South Korea

Case Summary

A high-profile divorce legal battle in South Korea between SK Group chairman Chey Tae-won and his former wife Roh So-young has lasted nearly a decade. The marriage ended after Chey publicly acknowledged an affair and a child outside marriage. The legal dispute focused on the division of marital assets, including SK Group shares. Courts have issued varying rulings on the property settlement and alimony, with the latest court order requiring Chey to pay Roh 944 billion won. The case raises significant questions about marital asset division in family-run conglomerates.

Verified True
Confidence 4
Incident Date Jan. 1, 2017
Incident Type Self Harm / Self Victim
Add cases to private collections and export structured data. View plans

Basic Information

Country: South Korea

State/Province: None

City/Region: Seoul

Incident Type: Self Harm / Self Victim

Relationship Status: Divorced

Relationship Duration: Approximately 27 years

Incident Date: Jan. 1, 2017

Relationship Journey

Relationship Origins:

  • No data available.

Relationship Stages:

  • Married Living Together

Analysis

Contributing Factors:

  • Cheating / Infidelity
  • Divorce / Separation

Red Flags:

  • Divorce Pending / Recent Separation

Motives:

  • Avoid divorce settlement

Relationship Outcomes:

  • Divorce filed
  • Legal case ongoing

People Link Graph

Relationship Journey Graph

1

Origin

How the relationship or connection began.

2

Status

  • Divorced

Approximately 27 years

3

Stages

  • Married Living Together

Important relationship phases recorded for this case.

4

Warning Signals

  • Divorce Pending / Recent Separation

Reported red flags or early concern points.

5

Pressure Points

  • Cheating / Infidelity
  • Divorce / Separation
  • Avoid divorce settlement

Contributing factors and possible motives from the available sources.

6

Incident

2017-01-01

7

Outcome

  • Divorce filed
  • Legal case ongoing

Recorded relationship or case outcome.

Sources

English labels are shown first. Original-language titles are preserved for source verification.

Roh So-young Divorce Legal Battle Involving Chey Tae-won, Seoul, South Korea

CNA · Original language: English

View original title

South Korea's high-profile divorce legal battle

AI Intelligence Assessment

Relationship Pattern

Infidelity

Pattern Analysis

The relationship ended following public acknowledgment of an extramarital affair and a child outside the marriage by Chey Tae-won. The subsequent legal battle focused on the division of marital assets, particularly shares in the family-run conglomerate SK Group. The case highlights complexities in asset division in high-net-worth divorces involving family businesses.

Investigative Notes

The legal battle has spanned nearly a decade with multiple court rulings adjusting the property settlement and alimony amounts. The Supreme Court ordered a rehearing due to legal errors in asset valuation. The latest ruling confirmed SK Group shares as marital assets but excluded shares transferred before the marriage breakdown and funds from the former father-in-law. The case remains potentially open to appeal.

Investigation Confusion

There was legal uncertainty regarding the inclusion of SK Group shares as marital assets and the calculation of the property settlement amount, leading to multiple court rulings and a Supreme Court rehearing.

Case Reconstruction / Puzzle Pieces

Chey Tae-won and Roh So-young married in 1988 and had three children. The marriage broke down in 2015 after Chey admitted to an affair and a child outside marriage. Chey filed for divorce in 2017, triggering a legal dispute over asset division. Initial court rulings awarded Roh a smaller settlement, which was later increased by an appeals court to include SK Group shares. The Supreme Court set aside the property division for recalculation but upheld alimony. The latest ruling reduced the settlement amount but confirmed the inclusion of SK shares as marital assets, excluding certain transferred shares and funds.

Key Takeaways

High-profile divorces involving family-run conglomerates can lead to prolonged legal battles over asset division. Public acknowledgment of infidelity can trigger separation and complex financial disputes. Courts may vary in rulings on what constitutes marital assets, especially with shares in family businesses. Legal clarity on asset valuation and timing of transfers is critical.

AI Case Q&A

What early signals mattered most?

Public acknowledgment of an affair and a child outside marriage were key early signals of marital breakdown.

Which clues helped connect the case?

Court rulings on asset division and alimony amounts helped connect the financial and legal dispute to the marital breakdown.

Which evidence types appeared strongest?

Court documents and rulings on property settlement and alimony were the strongest evidence types.

Witness / Eyewitness Statements

Not reported.

How did follow-up reports change the understanding?

Follow-up court rulings adjusted the property settlement amounts and clarified the inclusion of SK Group shares as marital assets.

What remained unclear?

Whether the dispute will finally end depends on potential appeals by either party.

← Back to Home