|
Extradyadic attachment
Attachment-related behavior
|
Vikram Chauhan
Suspect · Husband of the victim
|
Vikram's extramarital affair with Shefali began after their initial meeting in 2015. They maintained secrecy through covert communication and meetings, including a trip to Leh and Ladakh posing as a couple. This attachment competed directly with his marital relationship, motivating subsequent conflict and violence.
Context or trigger: Vikram met Shefali during a flat purchase in 2015 and their acquaintance grew stronger over time
Reported expression: Vikram secretly developed a romantic and sexual relationship with Shefali, engaging in clandestine meetings and deleting chat histories
|
Explicitly reported
Confidence: High
|
|
Marital dissatisfaction
Relationship stressor
|
Deepika Chauhan and Vikram Chauhan
|
Deepika's disbelief and refusal to accept Vikram's request for divorce led to escalating tension. Vikram's emotional withdrawal and mistreatment intensified, creating a prolonged period of conflict and dissatisfaction within the marriage.
Context or trigger: Vikram's affair and desire for divorce conflicted with Deepika's refusal to separate
Reported expression: Deepika attempted to preserve the marriage and family, while Vikram sought divorce and became increasingly hostile
|
Explicitly reported
Confidence: High
|
|
Emotional abuse
Control dynamics
|
Vikram Chauhan
Suspect · Husband of the victim
|
Vikram's emotional abuse involved sustained mistreatment and torture, which Deepika perceived as increasing beyond limits. This conduct was intended to coerce Deepika into ending the marriage, reflecting a pattern of degrading and manipulative behavior.
Context or trigger: After Deepika refused divorce, Vikram began torturing and mistreating her
Reported expression: Vikram's repeated mistreatment aimed to emotionally break Deepika and force her to leave
|
Explicitly reported
Confidence: High
|
|
Coercive control
Control dynamics
|
Vikram Chauhan
Suspect · Husband of the victim
|
Vikram's coercive control included emotional abuse, physical violence, and controlling Deepika's movements and decisions. His plan to kill Deepika disguised as an accident further illustrates his exertion of control to eliminate opposition.
Context or trigger: Vikram's insistence on divorce and controlling behavior escalated after Deepika's refusal
Reported expression: Vikram exerted domination and intimidation, including physical aggression and manipulation
|
Explicitly reported
Confidence: High
|
|
Instrumental aggression
Offender behavior
|
Vikram Chauhan
Suspect · Husband of the victim
|
Vikram's aggression was premeditated and goal-oriented, aiming to eliminate Deepika to pursue a new life with Shefali. He coordinated the murder during a family trip and attempted to mislead investigators by staging the scene.
Context or trigger: Vikram planned and executed Deepika's murder to remove marital obstacle
Reported expression: Deliberate killing disguised as an accident, including breaking planter to stage the scene
|
Narrative-supported psychological state
Confidence: High
|
|
Premeditation and planning
Planning or impulsivity
|
Vikram Chauhan and Shefali Tiwari
|
The murder was not impulsive but involved advance planning by Vikram and Shefali. They chose the trip to Nainital as the opportunity, communicated covertly, and prepared the scene to mislead authorities.
Context or trigger: Shefali proposed killing Deepika during a trip; Vikram agreed and planned accordingly
Reported expression: Coordinated plan involving trip, timing, and staging to disguise murder as accident
|
Explicitly reported
Confidence: High
|
|
Deception or concealment
Behavioral pattern
|
Vikram Chauhan
Suspect · Husband of the victim
|
Vikram engaged in deception by fabricating an accident scenario and deleting digital evidence. His inconsistent explanations and physical injuries raised police suspicion.
Context or trigger: After the murder, Vikram attempted to mislead police about the cause of Deepika's fall
Reported expression: Claimed Deepika slipped on broken planter; deleted incriminating chat histories
|
Explicitly reported
Confidence: High
|
|
Help-seeking or disclosure
Coping response
|
Deepika Chauhan
Victim · Wife of the offender
|
Deepika sought external support by involving family members to mediate the marital conflict. This reflects an attempt to disclose harm and seek resolution through social support.
Context or trigger: Deepika involved her in-laws to intervene after Vikram's request for divorce and mistreatment
Reported expression: She called her in-laws to reason with Vikram and attempted to preserve the family
|
Explicitly reported
Confidence: High
|
|
Depressive symptomatology
Emotional state
|
Deepika Chauhan
Victim · Wife of the offender
|
According to Vikram, Deepika had been emotionally withdrawn and appeared depressed, which may reflect her psychological distress amid marital conflict and abuse. This is supported by her insistence on returning early from the trip and her emotional reactions.
Context or trigger: Vikram reported Deepika had been withdrawn and seemed depressed before the incident
Reported expression: Deepika showed signs of emotional withdrawal and possible hopelessness
|
Explicitly reported
Confidence: Moderate
|
|
Fear or perceived threat
Emotional state
|
Deepika Chauhan
Victim · Wife of the offender
|
Deepika's verbal plea to Vikram during the attack indicates acute fear and perceived threat to her safety. Her focus on the children underscores her protective concern and emotional vulnerability at that moment.
Context or trigger: During the fatal incident, Deepika pleaded with Vikram not to kill her
Reported expression: Expressed fear for her life and concern for her children
|
Explicitly reported
Confidence: High
|
|
Family opposition or interference
Family dynamics
|
Deepika Chauhan
Victim · Wife of the offender
|
Deepika's family actively intervened post-incident by filing a formal complaint, indicating opposition to Vikram's conduct and involvement in the case. This reflects family-system conflict and protective dynamics.
Context or trigger: Deepika's father filed an FIR against Vikram and his brother Amit after the incident
Reported expression: Family involvement in legal action and attempts to protect Deepika
|
Explicitly reported
Confidence: High
|
|
Chronic interpersonal conflict
Relationship stressor
|
Deepika Chauhan and Vikram Chauhan
|
Neighbors and witnesses reported that Vikram had raised his hand on Deepika multiple times, indicating a pattern of chronic conflict and violence within the marriage prior to the fatal incident.
Context or trigger: Reports from society members and police indicated ongoing conflict and physical violence
Reported expression: Repeated arguments, physical aggression, and deteriorating relationship quality
|
Explicitly reported
Confidence: High
|
|
Co-offender facilitation
Offender behavior
|
Shefali Tiwari
Accused · Lover of offender
|
Shefali played a facilitative role by suggesting the murder plan, reinforcing Vikram's intent, and coordinating actions. Her involvement as a co-offender was critical in the escalation and execution of the crime.
Context or trigger: Shefali proposed the plan to kill Deepika and encouraged Vikram to proceed
Reported expression: Active encouragement and planning of the murder alongside Vikram
|
Explicitly reported
Confidence: High
|